The Official Cannabis Independent strain guides
The Official Cannabis collection · sheet 06No 06 · ChemdawgTHC & terpenes

Lab data

Chemdawg potency: THC, CBD and terpenes from 668 lab tests

In 668 state lab tests, Chemdawg flower had a median total THC of 22.94%, with the middle half of results between 19.25% and 25.37%.1 CBD is negligible, and β-caryophyllene is the leading terpene, just ahead of limonene and β-myrcene.1

22.94%median total THC
19.25%–25.37%middle half
15.86%–28.70%middle 80%
29.5%of tests at 25% THC or more
668tests · 28 labs

Beyond the median: the odds of a strong batch, how published figures hold up and more, in the Chemdawg lab report →

THC distribution

Total THC across 668 tests

0 20 40 60 80 2–3% THC: 0 tests 3–4% THC: 0 tests 4–5% THC: 0 tests 5–6% THC: 0 tests 6–7% THC: 0 tests 7–8% THC: 0 tests 8–9% THC: 0 tests 9–10% THC: 0 tests 10–11% THC: 3 tests 11–12% THC: 4 tests 12–13% THC: 12 tests 13–14% THC: 11 tests 14–15% THC: 21 tests 15–16% THC: 19 tests 16–17% THC: 31 tests 17–18% THC: 32 tests 18–19% THC: 25 tests 19–20% THC: 34 tests 20–21% THC: 38 tests 21–22% THC: 51 tests 22–23% THC: 54 tests 23–24% THC: 70 tests 24–25% THC: 65 tests 25–26% THC: 56 tests 26–27% THC: 32 tests 27–28% THC: 25 tests 28–29% THC: 25 tests 29–30% THC: 25 tests 30–31% THC: 12 tests 31–32% THC: 6 tests 32–33% THC: 8 tests 33–34% THC: 4 tests 34–35% THC: 5 tests 35–36% THC: 0 tests 4%8%12%16%20%24%28%32%36% median 22.94% Total THC, % by weight
One-point THC bands; shaded: middle half of results. 668 flower tests, 2014-12-29 to 2024-08-25.1

THC by year

Median total THC by year of testing

13% 17% 21% 25% 29% 2018: 15.29% (39 tests) 15.3 2018 n=39 2019: 19.45% (33 tests) 19.4 2019 n=33 2020: 23.38% (93 tests) 23.4 2020 n=93 2021: 21.31% (135 tests) 21.3 2021 n=135 2022: 20.83% (116 tests) 20.8 2022 n=116 2023: 24.87% (128 tests) 24.9 2023 n=128 2024: 29.10% (46 tests) 29.1 2024 n=46
Median total THC per year of testing; years with fewer than 20 tests are left out (2014: 1, 2015: 4, 2016: 3, 2017: 10).1

THC by state

StateTestsMedian THC
Nevada33424.21%
Michigan12120.51%
Maryland9620.51%
California4529.22%
Massachusetts2320.63%
Hawaii2215.75%
Colorado1318.68%
Washington1315.96%

States with at least 10 tests. Labs, testing rules and sampling differ by state, so compare states with care.1

Terpene profile

Chemdawg terpenes, median % by weight

β-Caryophyllene β-Caryophyllene: 0.35% (n=389) 0.35% n=389 Limonene Limonene: 0.35% (n=389) 0.35% n=389 β-Myrcene β-Myrcene: 0.26% (n=389) 0.26% n=389 α-Humulene α-Humulene: 0.11% (n=389) 0.11% n=389 Linalool Linalool: 0.11% (n=389) 0.11% n=389 β-Pinene β-Pinene: 0.06% (n=389) 0.06% n=389 α-Pinene α-Pinene: 0.03% (n=389) 0.03% n=389
Median share of each terpene by weight, from 389 tests that report individual terpenes. Median total terpenes: 1.74% (482 tests). Terpinolene and Ocimene had a median of zero: at least half of tests reported none.1

How Chemdawg compares

Lab-tested THC across 17 well-known strains

16% 20% 24% Wedding Cake Wedding Cake: median 23.01%, middle half 20.24%–25.70%, 3,085 tests 23.0% n=3,085 Chemdawg Chemdawg: median 22.94%, middle half 19.25%–25.37%, 668 tests 22.9% n=668 Blueberry Blueberry: median 21.91%, middle half 18.40%–25.23%, 411 tests 21.9% n=411 Sour Diesel Sour Diesel: median 21.68%, middle half 19.00%–25.30%, 1,071 tests 21.7% n=1,071 Gelato Gelato: median 21.49%, middle half 18.90%–24.63%, 1,845 tests 21.5% n=1,845 OG Kush OG Kush: median 20.87%, middle half 18.06%–23.36%, 379 tests 20.9% n=379 Super Lemon Haze Super Lemon Haze: median 20.84%, middle half 18.41%–23.48%, 1,543 tests 20.8% n=1,543 Northern Lights Northern Lights: median 20.03%, middle half 17.28%–22.05%, 406 tests 20.0% n=406 Strawberry Cough Strawberry Cough: median 20.00%, middle half 15.88%–23.00%, 231 tests 20.0% n=231 Blue Dream Blue Dream: median 19.96%, middle half 17.62%–22.37%, 2,118 tests 20.0% n=2,118 Pineapple Express Pineapple Express: median 19.80%, middle half 17.54%–21.75%, 461 tests 19.8% n=461 Girl Scout Cookies Girl Scout Cookies: median 19.72%, middle half 17.80%–21.92%, 567 tests 19.7% n=567 Jack Herer Jack Herer: median 19.59%, middle half 17.13%–22.00%, 910 tests 19.6% n=910 Green Crack Green Crack: median 19.52%, middle half 16.79%–21.73%, 1,236 tests 19.5% n=1,236 Durban Poison Durban Poison: median 19.45%, middle half 17.33%–21.99%, 528 tests 19.4% n=528 Trainwreck Trainwreck: median 18.65%, middle half 16.67%–21.42%, 248 tests 18.6% n=248 Granddaddy Purple Granddaddy Purple: median 17.87%, middle half 15.00%–21.55%, 512 tests 17.9% n=512 Median total THC (dot) and middle half of tests (bar)
Every strain processed with the same matching rules from the same dataset.1

How published THC figures compare

Strain databases publish a single figure or a range: Leafly lists 18% for Chemdawg and 21%, 25% and 22% on its Chem 91, Chemdawg #4 and Chem Sis pages, AllBud 19% and Weedmaps 19–24.8%; DNA Genetics says 18–25% is typical and that top phenotypes have tested above 30%.2,3,4,5,6,7,8 Seed sellers advertise 17–24% (Crop King’s Chemdawg), 21% (Crop King’s Chemdog), 22% (Top Dawg’s, per Lockbox Seeds), 24% (Humboldt Seed Organization; ILGM) and 24.5% (Green House), and Prime Cuts Nursery lists 19–27% for its Chemdawg 91 clone.9,10,11,12,13,14,15

In state lab results, the middle half of Chemdawg flower tested between 19.25% and 25.37%, so Leafly’s 18% sits in the bottom quarter of results and Weedmaps’ upper figure of 24.8% in the upper half; 29.5% of tests reached 25% or more, and one in ten came in above 28.70%.1 The 32.13% that a Chem Dog entry from Next Harvest recorded at the 2015 Denver Cannabis Cup, then the highest result at any High Times Cup, is a single competition sample; the highest result in our dataset is 34.94%.1,16

Labels matter. 68.9% of the matched tests name a cut, most of them Chem 91 (51.0% of all tests), and flower labeled with a cut name tested higher than plain “Chemdawg” labels (table below).1 Recent years also ran higher: the median was 20.83% in 2022 (116 tests), 24.87% in 2023 (128 tests) and 29.10% in 2024 (46 tests), though the mix of states changes from year to year.1

Total THC by the cut named on the certificate
Label on the certificateTestsMedian THCMiddle halfMain states
Chem 9134123.87%21.27%–26.12%NV (234), MD (51), CA (26)
Chemdawg, no cut named20819.15%16.00%–23.33%MI (57), MD (45), NV (41)
Chem D5424.73%23.05%–26.13%NV (40), MI (10), CA (1)
Chem 45122.67%19.24%–23.76%MI (29), NV (19), MA (3)
Numbered phenotypes (e.g. “Chem Dawg #170”)1429.01%27.09%–29.59%CA (13), MI (1)

Buckets with at least 10 tests. The label says what the grower wrote on the product, not what the plant is.1

Download the data

The 668 matched tests behind this page, one row per test: state, test date, lab, product name, product type, total THC, total CBD and terpenes.

License: CC BY 4.0. Credit: “Source: Cannlytics, cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.” The data were filtered and aggregated from the original.

Limits of this data

  • Coverage is uneven. Nevada (334), Michigan (121), Maryland (96), California (45) supply most tests, and Nevada alone supplies 50.0%; state medians range from 15.75% in Hawaii to 29.22% in California (states with 10 or more tests). Massachusetts, where the original cuts are grown, supplies only 23; no matched tests come from New York. Oregon and Rhode Island results carry no product names and could not be matched.
  • Some labs report higher THC than others, so we publish medians and middle ranges rather than maxima. No single lab accounts for more than 30.8% of these tests (28 labs in total).
  • Terpene medians come from 389 tests with individual terpene values, 331 of them from Nevada labs; the median total terpene content was 1.74% (482 tests). Maryland reports only total terpenes, and Washington, Michigan and Hawaii report none.
  • We matched names strictly: crosses and near-miss names such as “02 CHEM '91 x ALIENDAWG” (161) are excluded and counted, and duplicate certificates are removed. Chem 91, Chem D and Chem 4 are counted as Chemdawg and reported separately above; Chem OG, Purple Chemdawg and other named crosses are not.

Sources

  1. Cannlytics (CC BY 4.0), cannabis_results: public state lab results (filtered and aggregated by Official Cannabis). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  2. Leafly, Chemdawg (aka Chemdog) strain information. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  3. Leafly, Chem 91 strain information. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  4. Leafly, Chemdawg #4 strain information. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  5. Leafly, Chem Sis (Chem’s Sister) strain information. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  6. AllBud, Chemdawg marijuana strain information and reviews. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  7. Weedmaps, Chemdog (aka Chem 91) strain page. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  8. DNA Genetics, Chemdawg cannabis strain (2025-06-23). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  9. Crop King Seeds, Chemdawg feminized seeds. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  10. Crop King Seeds, Chemdog feminized seeds. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  11. Lockbox Seeds, Chemdawg strain (Top Dawg Seeds). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  12. Humboldt Seed Organization, Chemdawg (feminized seeds, from the Chem 91 elite clone). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  13. ILGM, Chemdawg feminized seeds. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  14. Green House Seed Co., Chemdog (feminised). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  15. Prime Cuts Nursery, Chemdawg 91 (clone listing). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
  16. High Times, The strongest weed strains on Earth (2016-06-28). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.